USPTO serial 76386837
NUCLEOTYPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUCLEOTYPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. YATES DOWELL, III
A YATES DOWELL III DOWELL & DOWELL PC2111 EISENHOWER AVE STE 406ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY BRIGHT-FIELD (OR FLUORESCENCE-MODE) LABORATORY MICROSCOPES EQUIPPED WITH MOTORIZED STAGE AND FOCUS CONTROL; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR COMPUTING GREY-LEVEL ENTROPY MATRICES AND EXTRACTING PROPRIETARY FEATURES FROM THESE MATRICES THAT HAVE BEEN SHOWN IN RETROSPECTIVE TRIALS TO DISCRIMINATE BETWEEN TUMORS LIKELY TO HAVE EITHER GOOD OR POOR RESPONSE TO SPECIFIC ANTI-CANCER TREATMENTS; APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR SCANNING, PROCESSING AND TRANSMITTING OF DATA,NAMELY HIGH-RESOLUTION DIGITAL CAMERAS SUITABLE FOR CAPTURING DETAILED IMAGES OF CELL NUCLEI TO REVEAL DETAILS OF THE CHROMATIN STRUCTURE WITHIN THE NUCLEI AND COMPUTERS FOR CONTROLLING THE MICROSCOPE AND CAPTURING AND STORING IMAGES IN DIGITAL FORM FOR SUBSEQUENT ANALYSIS; SCANNER EQUIPMENT, NAMELY BRIGHT-FIELD (OR FLUORESCENCE-MODE) LABORATORY MICROSCOPES EQUIPPED WITH MOTORIZED STAGE AND FOCUS CONTROL, HIGH-RESOLUTION DIGITAL CAMERAS SUITABLE FOR CAPTURING DETAILED IMAGES OF CELL NUCLEI TO REVEAL DETAILS OF THE CHROMATIN STRUCTURE WITHIN THE NUCLEI AND COMPUTERS FOR CONTROLLING THE MICROSCOPE AND CAPTURING AND STORING IMAGES IN DIGITAL FORM FOR SUBSEQUENT ANALYSIS AND REMOTE CONTROLLERS; PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR ALL THE AFOREMENTIONED GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF MEDICAL SURGERY; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH; PATHOLOGY SERVICES, NAMELY CANCER DIAGNOSTICS, DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, PROVISION OF RELIABLE PROGNOSIS FOR PATIENTS, ASSESSMENT OF PATIENTS FOR LIKELIHOOD OF RELAPSE-FREE SURVIVAL FROM CANCER;COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF MEDICAL DIAGNOSTICS, NAMELY MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTERS, PROVISION OF TRAINING, ADVICE AND COMPUTER UPGRADES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |