Drawing for 88 FOOTWEAR

USPTO serial 76387425

88 FOOTWEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 88 FOOTWEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew Miller

JOHN M KIM IP LEGAL ADVISORS PC600 W BROADWAY STE 1520SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, headwear and footwear, namely, shirts, sweatshirts, jerseys, pants, sweatpants, shorts, jackets, hats, caps, socks, shoes all the aforementioned goods for skateboarding purpose and to be sold skateboard shopsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Nov 29, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2003ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Dec 16, 2003GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 14, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance