USPTO serial 76387489
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Ontario, L4B 1E4, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel A. Scola, Jr.
DANIEL A SCOLA JR HOFFMANN & BARON, LLP6900 JERICHO TPKESYOSSET, NY 11791UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications equipment, namely, optical and electro-optical telecommunications components and subsystems, namely, modules, lasers, optical wave guides, optical filters, modulators, and optical network routers and switches, for use in optical, agile, dynamic, reconfigurable, and intelligent networks; photonic components, modules and subsystems for wavelength signal routing, monitoring and conditioning, namely, lasers, light wave guides, light filters and modulators, electro-optical wave guides, fiber optic light switches and fiber optic light amplifiers; photonic components and subsystems for wavelength management and control in wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) and dense wavelength division multiplexed (DWDM) optical networks, namely, modules, electronic circuits and computer software for the purpose of wavelength management and control; programmable optical network routers, switches and branching switches for remotely tuning or setting wavelengths in optical intelligent networks; programmable tunable grating modules for wavelength channel switching and routing; WDM and DWDM optical channel filters; tunable optical channel filters; dynamic wavelength channel switches and routers; diffraction gratings; Bragg gratings; tunable Bragg gratings; tunable grating modules; grating-based modules for wavelength channel switching and routing; grating-based modules for WDM and DWDM channel filtering; grating-based modules for wavelength referencing; athermal gratings; tunable athermal gratings; passive athermal gratings; athermal channel optical filters; tunable WDM and DWDM optical channel filters; grating-based sensor networks; grating-based sensors; fiberoptic sensors; fiberoptic light amplifiers; optical channel analyzers; lasers that are tunable to different optical wavelengths; pump lasers and pump laser stabilizers not for medical use; fiber optic sources; optical sources; reconfigurable add/drop routers; add/drop multiplexers; multi-channel add/drop multiplexers; reconfigurable add/drop multiplexers; WDM and DWDM multiplexers; multiplexers; demultiplexers; cross connects; optical connectors; optical couplers; optical switches; optical transmitters; optical receivers; optical network routers; optical amplifiers; dynamic-dispersion compensators; dynamic gain equalization optical filters; optical filters; wavelength converters; interleaves; fixed gain equalizing optical filters; and, optical network routers and switches, light filters, lasers not for medical use, light wave guides, and modulators, employing computer programs, software and firmware; telecommunications computer programs, software and firmware for use in signal routing, controlling, monitoring and conditioning; telecommunications computer programs, software and firmware for use in wavelength management and control; telecommunications computer programs, software and firmware for optical network and element management, interfacing and control; telecommunications computer programs, software and firmware for optical network diagnostics; and, telecommunications computer programs, software and firmware for monitoring and controlling optical elements in wavelength agile, dynamic telecommunication, reconfigurable telecommunication, and intelligent networks | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |