USPTO serial 76387555
KAMPUNG BOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KAMPUNG BOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Measat Broadcast Network Systems Sdn. Bhd.
Bukit Jalil 57000 Kuala Lumpur, MY
Other trademarks owned by Measat Broadcast Network Systems Sdn. Bhd.
Measat Broadcast Network Systems Sdn. Bhd.
Bukit Jalil 57000 Kuala Lumpur, MY
Other trademarks owned by Measat Broadcast Network Systems Sdn. Bhd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jane Shay Wald
JANE SHAY WALD IRELL & MANELLA LLP1800 AVE OF THE STARS, STE 900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, production of motion pictures and television programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Measat Broadcast Network Systems Sdn. Bhd.
- Other trademarks owned by Measat Broadcast Network Systems Sdn. Bhd.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named KAMPUNG BOY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |