USPTO serial 76387618
BEVERLY HILLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3123926Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 1, 2006
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BEVERLY HILLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
BEVERLY HILLS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND CIVIC ASSOCIATION
Beverly Hills, CA
Other trademarks owned by BEVERLY HILLS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND CIVIC ASSOCIATION
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill J. Chalmers
Jill J. Chalmers Bryan Cave LLP90 SOUTH CASCADE AVENUE, SUITE 1300COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | DIRECTORIES FEATURING LISTS OF MEMBERS AND REFERENCE INFORMATION; BOOKS AND PAMPHLETS FEATURING BUSINESS INFORMATION AND BUSINESS PRACTICES; PRINTED MATERIALS, NAMELY PAMPHLETS FEATURING INFORMATION ON RESIDENCES, SHOPPING, DINING AND PERSONAL CARE SERVICES; MAPS, CALENDARS, STATIONERY AND POSTCARDS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
- Other trademarks owned by CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
- Other trademarks owned by CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
- Other trademarks owned by BEVERLY HILLS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND CIVIC ASSOCIATION
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named BEVERLY HILLS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 1, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 10, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 13, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |