USPTO serial 76387830
PROCESSCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 8, 2006
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROCESSCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Endress + Hauser Process Solutions AG
CH-4153 Reinach, CH
Other trademarks owned by Endress + Hauser Process Solutions AG
Endress + Hauser Process Solutions AG
CH-4153 Reinach, CH
Other trademarks owned by Endress + Hauser Process Solutions AG
Endress + Hauser Process Solutions AG
CH-4153 Reinach, CH
Other trademarks owned by Endress + Hauser Process Solutions AG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Felix J. D'Ambrosio
BACON & THOMAS PLLC625 SLATERS LN 4TH FLALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INDUSTRIAL PROCESS ENGINEERING, ALSO KNOWN AS SOFTWARE FOR DEFINING, DESIGNING, IMPLEMENTING, AND CONTROLLING INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES IN THE FIELD OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS AUTOMATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INDUSTRIAL PROCESS ENGINEERING, ALSO KNOWN AS SOFTWARE FOR OPTIMIZING INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES, WITH RESPECT TO TARGET PARAMETERS, NAMELY, YIELD RATE, PRODUCT OUTPUT, PRODUCT QUALITY, MATERIAL CONSUMPTION, ENERGY EFFICIENCY, COST EFFICIENCY, ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY, SAFETY, PROCESS STABILITY, RELIABILITY, AND PROCESSING TIME; SOFTWARE FOR INDUSTRIAL PROCESS CONTROL, ALSO KNOW AS SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES IN THE FIELD OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS AUTOMATION; SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING BATCH PROCESSES IN THE FIELD OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS AUTOMATION; SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING BATCH PROCESSES IN THE FIELD OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS AUTOMATION; SOFTWARE FOR PROCESS DOCUMENTATION AND FOR PRODUCING PROCESS REPORTS FOR PROCESSES IN THE FIELD OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS AUTOMATION; SOFTWARE FOR PROCESS DOCUMENTATION AND FOR PRODUCING PROCESS REPORTS FOR BATCHES IN A PROCESS IN THE FIELD OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS AUTOMATION; INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, MEASURING TRANSMITTERS FOR MEASURING PROCESS PARAMETERS OF PROCESSES IN THE FIELD OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS AUTOMATION, NAMELY, PRESSURE, MASS FLOW RATE, VOLUME FLOW RATE, VISCOSITY, FILLING LEVEL OF FLUIDS, VAPORS OR BULK MATERIALS, TEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY, PH-VALUE, OXIDATION-REDUCTION POTENTIAL, ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY, DISSOLVED ION-CONTENT, OXYGEN-CONTENT, SPECIFIC GRAVITY, TURBIDITY, CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF FLUIDS, SOLUTIONS, SUSPENSIONS, GASES, VAPORS, AND BULK MATERIALS; ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC AND OPTICAL CONTROLLERS AND REGULATORS FOR CONTROLLING AND REGULATING, PROCESS PARAMETERS OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES IN THE FIELD OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS AUTOMATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Endress + Hauser Process Solutions AG
- Other trademarks owned by Endress + Hauser Process Solutions AG
- Other trademarks owned by Endress + Hauser Process Solutions AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PROCESSCARE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |