USPTO serial 76387862
NANOSYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 1, 2009
- Examiner
- KEAN, AMY C
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with NANOSYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 163-0043, JP
Milpitas, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Matthews Hall
M. Matthews Hall Alleman Hall Creasman & Tuttle LLP900 SW 5th Ave.Suite 2300Portland, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals, namely, chromophores; chemicals, namely, fluorophores; chemicals in the nature of chromophoric and fluorophoric nanomaterials and fluorescent chemical powders and fluids for use in the manufacture of a wide variety of goods; chromophoric and fluorophoric nanomaterials, namely, molecular scale chemical forms, for use in the manufacture of industrial chemicals, [ electronic devices, electronic apparatus and coatings; chromophoric and fluorophoric nanomaterials, namely, semiconductor nanocrystal reagents for scientific or research use ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [ semiconductors, excluding software; electronic components and subsystems, namely, electrical connectors; light emitting diodes; ] visual displays, electric luminescent display panels, [ luminous signs; nanomaterials in the nature of nanoscale electronic components for use in the manufacture of semiconductors, ] electronic components and subsystems, light emitting diodes, [ lasers, computer hardware, ] telecommunications hardware, [ data storage hardware, circuit boards, ] visual displays, [ photovoltaics, solar cells, ] chromophores, fluorophores,[ biosensors, ] [ chemical sensors; nanomaterials for use in the manufacture of semiconductors, ] electronic computers and subsystems, light emitting diodes, [ lasers, ] computer hardware, [ telecommunications hardware, communications hardware, ] optical hardware, [ data storage hardware, circuit boards, ] visual displays, [ photovoltaics, solar cells, ] chromophores, fluorophores, [ biosensors, ] chemical sensors and energy conversion devices, namely, nanometer scale devices and device components excluding software for use in integrated circuits | ACTIVE | Aug 22, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nanosys, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nanosys, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Shoei Chemical Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nanosys, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NANOSYS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2024 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2024 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 19, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 15, 2023 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 9, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 9, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 29, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 6, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 21, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 11, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |