Drawing for TELE-TECH

USPTO serial 76387974

TELE-TECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TELE-TECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David S. Cox

DAVID S COX BUIST, MOORE, SMYTHE & MCGEE PA5 EXCHANGE ST PO BOX 999CHARLESTON, SC 29402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035telecommunication billing services, in the nature of compiling international federal and state rate and tariff computationsABANDONEDJan 1, 1980

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 16, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 16, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 16, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 8, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 18, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 5, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 9, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 30, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 5, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance