Drawing for ON TAP WAREHOUSE

USPTO serial 76388103

ON TAP WAREHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ON TAP WAREHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James E. Brunton

JAMES E BRUNTON700 N BRAND BLVD STE 860GLENDALE, CA 91203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035retail services featuring keg dispensing equipment; direct marketing advertisement for others in the field of keg dispensing equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 4, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 8, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance