USPTO serial 76388137
Serial No. 76388137
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 76388137?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Margaret Ferguson
Margaret Ferguson KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP101 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Non-metal pipe racks | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | Smoker's articles, namely, humidor humidifiers, non-precious metal ashtrays, non-precious metal and non-electric cigar and cigarette lighters, non-precious metal match boxes, matches, tobacco pouches, cigar cutter, non-precious metal cigar cases, non-precious metal cigar holders, non-precious metal cigarette cases and pipe cleaners not made of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |