USPTO serial 76388384
EPSON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPSON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, JP
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill Anderfuren
JILL ANDERFUREN MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUNSTE 6300 SEARS TWR233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Printing, digital printing; scanning and electronic image data processing of photographs and pictures; film developing; photograph printing; laminating of photographs; bookbinding, embroidering, optical glass grinding, transforming pictures and optical photographs to digital image data; photographic customization services, namely, reproducing; morphing, composing and printing of digital graphic and image data; recording photographic image data onto optical disks, CD-ROMs, Integrated Circuit memories and data media; photograph texturizing, namely altering the surface texture of photographic and printed digital images | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 5, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |