USPTO serial 76388557
SHIFT_
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHIFT_?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NISSAN JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
YOKOHAMA-SHI, KANAGAWA-KEN, JP
NISSAN JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
YOKOHAMA-SHI, KANAGAWA-KEN, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Micol Cecchi
Micol Cecchi Nissan North America, Inc.333 Commerce StreetLegal Department, B7-K2Nashville, TN 37201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | motor vehicle repair and maintenance services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |