USPTO serial 76388592
I
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with I?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ridgewood, NJ
Ridgewood, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark M. Jaffe
BRYAN M FRIEDMAN FRIEDMAN PETERSON STROFFE & GERARD PC19800 MACARTHUR BLVD STE 1100IRVINE, CA 92612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Rollerskates; Skateboards; Athletic sporting goods, namely, athletic elbow, wrist and knee guards and sport supports | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |