USPTO serial 76388825
THE KERNEL POPPER MICROWAVE POPCORN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE KERNEL POPPER MICROWAVE POPCORN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel E. Kattman
DANIEL E KATTMAN REINHART, BOERNER, VAN DEUREN, NORRIS ET1000 N WATER ST STE 2100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-3186UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | prepackaged unpopped popcorn intended for preparation in a microwave oven | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |