USPTO serial 76388904
LUKOIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2011
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with LUKOIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PUBLIC JOINT STOCK COMPANY "OIL COMPANY "LUKOIL"
MOSCOW, RU
Other trademarks owned by PUBLIC JOINT STOCK COMPANY "OIL COMPANY "LUKOIL"
Open Joint Stock Company "Oil Company Lukoil"
Moscow 101000, RU
Other trademarks owned by Open Joint Stock Company "Oil Company Lukoil"
Open Joint Stock Company "Oil Company Lukoil"
Moscow 101000, RU
Other trademarks owned by Open Joint Stock Company "Oil Company Lukoil"
Open Joint Stock Company "Oil Company Lukoil"
Moscow 101000, RU
Other trademarks owned by Open Joint Stock Company "Oil Company Lukoil"
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David C. Lee
David C. Lee Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP2001 K Street N.W.Robert S. Strauss TowerWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | heat transfer oils | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 2010 |
| 035 | [ Retail tire stores; ] franchising, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and operation of retail gasoline supply services; retail gasoline supply services; promoting the sale of credit card accounts through the administration of incentive awards programs; promoting the sale of goods and services of others through the distribution of printed materials and promotional contests | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PUBLIC JOINT STOCK COMPANY "OIL COMPANY "LUKOIL"
- Other trademarks owned by Open Joint Stock Company "Oil Company Lukoil"
- Other trademarks owned by Open Joint Stock Company "Oil Company Lukoil"
- Other trademarks owned by Open Joint Stock Company "Oil Company Lukoil"
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named LUKOIL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2022 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 12, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 12, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 11, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 7, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |