USPTO serial 76388989
HONDA INTELLIGENT KEY SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HONDA INTELLIGENT KEY SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles M. Marmelstein
CHARLES M MARMELSTEIN ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & ET AL1050 CONNECTICUT AVE N W STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named HONDA INTELLIGENT KEY SYSTEM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 29, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |