USPTO serial 76389082
JACKBEANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JACKBEANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Curtis L. Harrington
CURTIS L HARRINGTON CURTIS L. HARRINGTON & ASSOCIATES6300 STATE UNIVERSITY DR STE 250LONG BEACH, CA 90815UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Milk products, namely, bean milk, cheese, butter, yogurt, meat products, namely, sausages, ham, hamburger meat, hot dog meat, steak and meat croquettes; prepared fish products, namely, prepared fish, fish cakes, namely, kamaboko, fish cakes, namely, chikuwa, fish cakes, namely, hanpen and fish cakes, namely, tsumire; eggs; stews, soups, potato au gratin and packaged entrees consisting primarily of meat | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Curry, preparations of confectionery and bread, namely, freezable liquid for use in making frozen confections, frozen confections, peanut butter confectionery chips, bread, bread sticks, food package combinations consisting primarily of bread, crackers and/or cookies, bread rolls, stuffing mixes containing bread; ice creams, ice monaka, namely, ice cream wrapped in pastry shells; soft ice creams; sherbets; prepared foods of cereals, namely, processed plant based grains; Worcestershire sauce, gravy sauce, ketchup, soy sauce, vinegar, soba noodles sauce, food dressings, namely, salad dressing, edible oils, cooking oils, food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring, ingredient or filler, mayonnaise, barbecue sauce, Chinese meat dumplings, sandwiches, sushi, steamed bun with meat, hamburger sandwiches, pizzas, packaged entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; hot dog sandwiches, meat pies, raviolis, sweetened flavored gelatin desserts, puddings and cakes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |