USPTO serial 76389083
Serial No. 76389083
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 22, 2005
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 76389083?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Curtis L. Harrington
CURTIS L HARRINGTON CURTIS L HARRINGTON & ASSOCIATES6300 STATE UNIVERSITY DR STE 250LONG BEACH, CA 90815UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Milk products, namely, bean milk, cheese, butter, yogurt, meat products, namely, sausages, ham, hamburger meat, hot dog meat, steak and meat croquettes; prepared fish products, namely, prepared fish, fish cakes, namely, kamaboko, fish cakes, namely, chikuwa, fish cakes, namely, hanpen and fish cakes, namely, tsumire; eggs; stews, soups, potato au gratin and packaged entrees consisting primarily of meat | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 10, 2004 |
| 030 | Curry, preparations of confectionery and bread, namely, freezable liquid for use in making frozen confections, frozen confections, peanut butter confectionery chips, bread, bread sticks, food package combinations consisting primarily of bread, crackers and/or cookies, bread rolls, stuffing mixes containing bread; ice creams, ice monaka, namely, ice cream wrapped in pastry shells; soft ice creams; sherbets; prepared foods of cereals, namely, processed plant based grains; Worcestershire sauce, gravy sauce, ketchup, soy sauce, vinegar, soba noodles sauce, food dressings, namely, salad dressing, edible oils, cooking oils, food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring, ingredient or filler, mayonnaise, barbecue sauce, Chinese meat dumplings, sandwiches, sushi, steamed bun with meat, hamburger sandwiches, pizzas, packaged entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice, hot dog sandwiches, meat pies, raviolis, sweetened flavored gelatin desserts, puddings and cakes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 10, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Peacebeans Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Peacebeans Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Peacebeans Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |