USPTO serial 76389484
INTUITIVE IDENTIFICATION DIRECTOR (IID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTUITIVE IDENTIFICATION DIRECTOR (IID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER APPLICATION INTERFACE SOFTWARE FOR ENTERPRISE RESOURCE OF BIOMTREIC IDENTIFICATION CONFIRMATION PLANNING AND RELATED APPLICATIONS, NAMELY FOR CONTROLLING COMMUNICATION ACCESS BETWEEN EXTERNAL SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS AND GOVERNING DATA SOURCE COMPARISONS, COMPILATION AND CONFIRMATION FOR STOP WATCH ACCESS FUNCTIONS WITHIN THE SOFTWARE IN ORDER TO PROVIDE EXECUTING STANDARD DATA PROCESSING METHODS ESPECIALLY TO INVOKE DATABASE APPLICATIONS TO MANIPULATE CONSISTENT DATA OBJECTS BETWEEN HOSPITAL MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND 3RD PARTY SYSTEMS FOR PATIENT PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY AS WELL AS PERTINENT CONFIDENTIAL MEDICAL INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | COMPUTER PROGRAM MANUALS AND HANDBOOKS, EDUCATIONAL TRAINING MANUALS AND HANDBOOKS, CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE USE OF DATA PROCESSING AND INTERFACE PROGRAMS AND SYSTEMS INTEGRATION | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |