USPTO serial 76389680
HERBAL ENERGY BOOSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HERBAL ENERGY BOOSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
I. MORLEY DRUCKER
I MORLEY DRUCKER FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT, LLP6060 CTR DR TENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Herbal supplements; vitamins and nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 12, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |