USPTO serial 76389714
BIOCAOLON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIOCAOLON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna J. Bunton
DONNA J BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE PC1100 N GLEBE RD8TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22201-4714Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISEASES OF THE DIGESTIVE SYSTEM, GYNECOLOGICAL DISEASES AND SKIN DISEASES; VETERINARY PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISEASES OF THE DIGESTIVE SYSTEM, GYNECOLOGICAL DISEASES AND SKIN DISEASES FOR PETS; MEDICAL HYGIENIC PREPARATIONS FOR WOMAN'S INTIMATE HYGIENE, NAMELY, VAGINAL COMPRESSES AND DOUCHES; DIETETIC SUBSTANCES, NAMELY, FOODS FOR PERSONS ON MEDICALLY RESTRICTED DIETS ADAPTED FOR MEDICAL USES; FOOD FOR BABIES; NUTRACEUTICALS FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISEASES OF THE DIGESTIVE SYSTEM, GYNECOLOGICAL DISEASE AND SKIN DISEASES; AND FOOD SUPPLEMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |