USPTO serial 76389736
W.I.T.C.H WILL IRMA TARANEE CORNELIA HAY LIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with W.I.T.C.H WILL IRMA TARANEE CORNELIA HAY LIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded audio cassettes, phonograph records, and compact discs, pre-recorded video cassettes, laser video discs, digital video discs, digital versatile discs, CD-ROM discs all featuring music and stories for children; computer game programs and computer game software, featuring animated stories and learning activities for children; motion picture films featuring animated stories for children; eyeglasses and sunglasses; decorative refrigerator magnets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Disney Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Disney Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named W.I.T.C.H WILL IRMA TARANEE CORNELIA HAY LIN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |