USPTO serial 76389761
ZIPPERCARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHAM, LANA H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZIPPERCARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory C. Smith
GREGORY C SMITH GARVEY, SMITH, NEHRBASS & DOODY, LLC3838 N CAUSEWAY BLVD STE 3290METAIRIE, LA 70002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Magnetically encoded debit cards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |