USPTO serial 76389995
STEARNS - ROGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STEARNS - ROGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VYTAS R. MATAS
VYTAS R MATAS MATAS ASSOCIATES2412 CEDARWOOD RDPEPPPER PIKE, OH 44124UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF NUCLEAR FUEL MOVEMENT SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | Aug 15, 2003 |
| 042 | REPAIR SERVICES NAMELY REFURBISHMENT, MODIFICATION AND UPGRADE OF NUCLEAR FUEL MOVEMENT SYSTEMS SUCH AS REFUELING BRIDGES IN CONTAINMENT, NUCLEAR FUEL TRANSFER, SYSTEMS AND SPENT FUEL POOL BRIDGES | ACTIVE | Apr 9, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 20, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |