USPTO serial 76390088
ZIPCARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZIPCARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory C. Smith
GREGORY C SMITH GARVEY, SMITH, NEHRBASS & DOODY, LLC3838 N CAUSEWAY BLVDSTE 3290METAIRIE, LA 70002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | card with activation control | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |