Drawing for TRIBAL SESSIONS

USPTO serial 76390245

TRIBAL SESSIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRIBAL SESSIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded audio tapes featuring musical sound recordings; pre-recorded compact discs featuring musical sound recordings; pre-recorded video tapes featuring sound recordings; pre-recorded digital versatile discs (DVD) featuring musical sound recordings, motion picture films featuring musical sound recordings; cinematographic films featuring musical sound recordings; blank compact discs; computer game software, firmware and hardware for use in playing computer games; video game machines for use with televisions; sunglassesACTIVE—
041Arranging, operating and providing facilities for festivals, parties, dances, concerts, shows, discos, nightclubs, performances, film, theatre, competitions and fund-raising events; radio entertainment services relating to music and festivals; television entertainment services relating to music and festivals; publication of books; music publishing services; motion picture film production; production of radio and television programs; music production services; production of video cassettes and video discs for others; record productionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 3, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 12, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 8, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 3, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 25, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance