USPTO serial 76390378
ADVANCING CANCER CARE IN AMERICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADVANCING CANCER CARE IN AMERICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard D. Fladung
RICHARD D FLADUNG AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP44TH FL 1111 LOUISIANA STHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed materials, namely, brochures, web pages, and notices related to cancer and related public health issues | ABANDONED | Apr 29, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |