Drawing for WEFFICIENT

USPTO serial 76390514

WEFFICIENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEFFICIENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

IRA S. DORMAN

IRA S DORMAN330 ROBERTS ST STE 200EAST HARTFORD, CT 06108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business marketing consulting servicesACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services, namely, providing fiber optic network services, electronic transmission of data and documents via a computer terminal, and local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable and satellite transmissions; radio broadcasting; television broadcasting; and electronic mail servicesACTIVE—
042computer programming for others; maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software; computer software design for others; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use on computer hardware and software systems for others; graphic arts designing; rental of computer software; computer services, namely leasing of access time to a computer database and leasing access time to a computer for the manipulation of data; computer project management services and/or conducting of feasibility studies; computer services, namely, creating, designing, implementing and maintaining internet and intranet web sites for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 4, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 14, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 8, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 5, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 5, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 5, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 1, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 1, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 22, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 26, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance