Drawing for PEARL DIVER

USPTO serial 76390607

PEARL DIVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEARL DIVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ernest G. Bootsma

ERNEST G BOOTSMA WHITE & LEE LLP805 SW BROADWAY STE 2440PORTLAND, OR 97205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Beverage alcohol products, namely, liqueurs, prepared alcohol cocktails, and alcoholic beverages produced from a brewed malt base and containing sweeteners and natural flavorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 3, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 3, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 6, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 29, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance