USPTO serial 76391072
ULTRA SAFE LED LIGHTED VEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2684960Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 4, 2003
- Examiner
- HALL, ALLISON
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ULTRA SAFE LED LIGHTED VEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PROTECTIVE CLOTHING, NAMELY, LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) LIGHTED SAFETY VESTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2002 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |