USPTO serial 76391579
MAXIMUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 13, 2004
- Examiner
- DALIER, LAURIEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAXIMUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Eindhoven, NL
Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Eindhoven, NL
Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Eindhoven, NL
Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
ALMELO, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ernestine C. Bartlett
KEITH W MEDANSKY PIPER RUDNICK LLPPO BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | X-ray fluorescence disc analyser and X-ray fluorescence wafer analyser | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by PANALYTICAL B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MAXIMUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |