Drawing for GREENMAX

USPTO serial 76391613

GREENMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREENMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NANCY J MORIARTY

NANCY J MORIARTY CHERNOFF, VILHAUER, MCCLUNG ET AL1600 ODS TWR601 S W SECOND AVEPORTLAND, OR 97204-3157

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting public awareness of the need to reduce the environmental impact of producing electricity by promoting the use of electricity from environmentally friendly sources in the nature of promoting the creation, development and expansion of environmentally friendly energy sources by providing long term contracts for the production of environmentally friendly energyACTIVE—
039Public utility services in the nature of distribution of electrical power to residential and commercial customers; consulting in the field of the supply and distribution of electrical energy arising from environmentally friendly sourcesACTIVE—
040Computer services, namely, providing a website featuring information in the field of energy resources, namely, environmentally friendly energy productionACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely conducting seminars and lectures in the field of environmentally friendly energy sources and distributing course materials, namely, printed educational materials, in connection therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 10, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 16, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 8, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2002AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance