Drawing for FREEDOM FORMATION

USPTO serial 76391672

FREEDOM FORMATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEPHENS, SONYA B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FREEDOM FORMATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott L. Harper

SCOTT L HARPER CARSTENS YEE & CAHOON, LLPP O BOX 802334DALLAS, TX 75380UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Calendars, Stationery, and Greeting CardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 21, 2004MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 21, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 20, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 14, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 17, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 17, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 9, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 6, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance