Drawing for I-PACT

USPTO serial 76391898

I-PACT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3261390Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 10, 2007
Examiner
POWER, MARGARET
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with I-PACT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norm D. St. Landau

Jennifer L. Dean DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K Street NWSuite 1100Washington, DC 20005-1209

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042LEGAL SERVICESSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 10, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Feb 19, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 21, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 17, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 9, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 10, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 1, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 30, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Mar 31, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 10, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 8, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 30, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 8, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 20, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 4, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 1, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 15, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 21, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance