Drawing for WRITE BROTHERS

USPTO serial 76392008

WRITE BROTHERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WRITE BROTHERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. D. Harriman II, Esq.

JOHN D HARRIMAN II BROWN RAYSMAN MILLSTEIN FELDER & STEINER12TH FL1880 CENTURY PARK ELOS ANGELES, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Manuals for use by authors to assist in writing and story developmentACTIVEAug 8, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 17, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 22, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 30, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 10, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 31, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2002CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED—
Nov 22, 2002AAUDAMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED—
Oct 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance