USPTO serial 76392091
COMPASS - FACT BASED CONSULTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2812215Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 10, 2004
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COMPASS - FACT BASED CONSULTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NL-4837 BN BREDA, NL
3062 MA Rotterdam, NL
3062 MA Rotterdam, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neal E. Friedman
Neal E. Friedman Davis & Bujold, PLLC112 Pleasant StreetConcord, NH 03301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services using comparative analysis methods; business consultancy using analysis of a client's or third party's operation and performance relative to the operations and performances of other entities; business consultancy using comparative analysis of a client's or third party's performance; business consultancy using comparative analysis of a client's or third party's information technology operations; business consultancy using a framework of mathematical models for analysis of a client's or third party's information technology and business processes; business consultancy relating to outsourcing using analysis of business entity's operations and performance relative to the operations and performances of other entities; consultancy relating to outsourcing using comparative analysis of a business entity's performance | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Professional consultancy based on comparative analysis in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; professional consultancy using analysis of a client's third party's operation and performance relative to the operations and performances of other entities in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; professional consultancy using comparative analysis of a client's or third party's performance in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; professional consultancy using comparative analysis of a client's or third party's information technology operation in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; professional consultancy using a framework of mathematical models for analysis of a client's or third party's information technology and business processes in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Compass Publishing BV
- Other trademarks owned by Compass Publishing BV
- Other trademarks owned by Compass Publishing BV
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COMPASS - FACT BASED CONSULTING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 11, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |