USPTO serial 76392148
INTELLIGENT DOCUMENT SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 2003
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTELLIGENT DOCUMENT SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
McLeansville, NC
McLeansville, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard A. MacCord, Jr.
HOWARD A MACCORD JR MACCORD MASON PLLCP O BOX 2974GREENSBORO, NC 27402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE WHICH ALLOWS MULTIPLE USERS TO COLLABORATE ON A SINGLE DOCUMENT, WHICH INSERTS DIGITAL SIGNATURES AND WHICH ARCHIVES AND RETRIEVES DATA ACCORDING TO SPECIAL SEARCH CRITERIA DEFINED BY THE USER | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 10, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 14, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |