USPTO serial 76392157
JOURNAL ON ACTIVE AGING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 14, 2004
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with JOURNAL ON ACTIVE AGING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Abercrombie Consulting Services Inc.
Vancouver, CA
Other trademarks owned by Abercrombie Consulting Services Inc.
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Abercrombie Consulting Services Inc.
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by Abercrombie Consulting Services Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Trisha A. Dore
Trisha A. Dore Accupro Trademark Services LLP401 West Georgia StreetSuite 702Vancouver, BC, V6B5A1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | publication namely a magazine for professionals dealing in the area of seniors health, fitness, housing, wellness, cardiac rehabilitation and therapy | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Abercrombie Consulting Services Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ICAA SERVICES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Abercrombie Consulting Services Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named JOURNAL ON ACTIVE AGING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 1, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2003 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |