USPTO serial 76392933
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario M5V BM4, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer K. Lawson
JENNIFER K LAWSON ATTN TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORTESTA, HURWITZ & THIBEAULT, LLPHIGH ST TWR 125 HIGH STBOSTON, MA 02110| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | outsourced marketing services, namely - business marketing consulting services; merchandising and field marketing, namely, promoting the goods and services of others through conducting special events, and demonstration; product sample distribution, coupon distribution, conducting inventories, stocking shelves, designing product displays, conducting in-shore events, exhibits, demonstration; analyzing result of promotions, namely, conducting marketing studies; merchandising services in the nature of a customer loyalty program featuring a promotional gift redemption program to induce the purchasing public to buy the goods of others; direct marketing; advertising for others, namely telemarketing, direct mail via email; providing information about the products and services of others over the Internet; computerized database management | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |