USPTO serial 76392957
IVIS-LITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IVIS-LITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WPI Micro Processor Systems, Inc.
Sterling Heights, MI
SANTA BARBARA, CA
SANTA BARBARA, CA
SANTA BARBARA, CA
SNATA BARBARA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAYE G. HEYBL
MARIA CECILLE D AZARCON ROBERT BOSCH CORPORATION2800 S 25TH AVEBROADVIEW, IL 60155UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE FOR APPLICATION INTEGRATION AND SOFTWARE FOR VEHICLE TELEMATICS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WPI Micro Processor Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by VETRONIX CORPORATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VETRONIX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by VETRONIX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by VTX AUQISITION CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named IVIS-LITE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |