USPTO serial 76393561
INSITEPROXY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INSITEPROXY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura Talley Geyer, Esq.
LAURA TALLEY GEYER ESQ JONES, DAY, REAVIS & POGUE51 LOUISIANA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20001-2113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE FOR ACQUIRING, INTERPRETING, SEARCHABLY INDEXING AND PROXY STORING INTERNET-BASED MATERIAL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |