USPTO serial 76394192
SACHS RDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SACHS RDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lance J. Lieberman, Esq.
LANCE J LIEBERMAN ESQ COHEN, PONTAN, LIEBERMAN & PAVANE551 FIFTH AVE STE 1210NEW YORK, NY 10176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | SHOCK ABSORBERS FOR MACHINES AND PARTS THEREOF, NAMELY, CYLINDER PIPES, PISTONS AND SPRINGS; AND RUBBER BEARINGS FOR MACHINES AND FOR ENGINES OF MOTOR VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | PARTS OF MOTOR VEHICLES, NAMELY, WHEEL SUSPENSIONS, AXLES, TRANSVERSE LEVERS, SPRING LEGS, VIBRATION DAMPERS , AND ADJUSTING DRIVES FOR MOTOR VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | SERVICES FOR MOTOR VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS, NAMELY, TECHNICAL GUIDANCE, ADVICE AND ASSISTANCE IN THE DESIGN AND COORDINATION OF MOTOR VEHICLE PARTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 17, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |