USPTO serial 76394344
THE CLASS LIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOWARD, CHERYL L
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE CLASS LIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua B. Levy
JOSHUA B LEVYTWO PLZ E STE 1085330 E KILBOUM AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software to primary and secondary educational institution subscribers giving such subscribers the tools to, without limitation, create or enhance web sites; create and utilize calendaring systems; develop institutional subscriber information databases; access in real time subscriber developed databases; merge and print mailing labels, directories and lists from subscriber developed databases; prepare and send mass emails; format on-line applications for receiving and tracking donations and pledges; organize and enhance fund-raising efforts; provided end-user information via the World Wide Web | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |