USPTO serial 76395133
VISIQUANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISIQUANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cheryl A. Withycombe
CHERYL A WITHYCOMBE BAKER & MCKENZIE101 W BROADWAY 12TH FLSAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Fluorescent dyes, fluorescent compounds, fluorophores, and compounds containing fluorescent materials for scientific research use in the fields of fluoroscopy, fluorography, fluorimetry, fluorescence measurements, and fluorescent dyes | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | fluorescent dyes, fluorescent compounds, fluorophores, and compounds containing fluorescent materials for clinical or medical laboratory use in the fields of fluoroscopy, fluorography, fluorimetry, fluorescence measurements, and fluorescent dyes | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | laboratory equipment, namely, fluorography instruments, fluorimetry instruments, fluoroscopy instruments, fluorescence detectors, imagers, and analyzers; instruments for detecting and analyzing fluorescence in medical, scientific, and laboratory uses; fluorescence excitation sources, namely x-ray tubes, flash lamps, diodes,light sources, radiation sources, lasers, monochromators, arc lamps, and XRF spectrometers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | fluorescence detection, measurement and analysis services in the fields of medicine, quantitative analysis, and chemical testing for medical and scientific | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hyperion, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hyperion, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VISIQUANT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |