Drawing for POURQUOI PAS

USPTO serial 76395524

POURQUOI PAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with POURQUOI PAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Virgil H. Marsh

VIRGIL H MARSH FISHER, CHRISTEN & SABOL1725 K ST NW STE 1108WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather and imitation of leather, sold in bulk; animal skins; trunks and suitcases; umbrellas; parasols and walking sticks; whips and saddlery; bags for climbers and mountaineering sticks; bags for campers; beach bags; travel bags; leather and textile shopping bags; travelling sets for holding cosmetics and travelling trunks; collars and covers for animals; muzzles; walking stick seats; school bags; pocket wallets; hunters' accessories, namely, game bags; key cases; bags for carrying infantsABANDONED—
025Clothing for men, women and children, namely underware; sweaters; skirts; dresses; pants; jackets; coats; shirts; shawls; belts; dress gloves; rainwear; hats; caps; socks; stockings; pantyhose; shoes excepting orthopedic shoes; slippers; boots; leather clothing and imitation leather clothing, namely, pants, skirtsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 4, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 4, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 18, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 18, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 18, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 18, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 6, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 30, 2004OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 2, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 22, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance