Drawing for TRX PROXI

USPTO serial 76395536

TRX PROXI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRX PROXI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FRANK S BENJAMIN

FRANK S BENJAMIN MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE LLPSTE 5300303 PEACHTREE ST NEATLANTA, GA 30308

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035outsourcing services for others in the fields of fulfilling on line orders, providing customer service support and data management and reportingACTIVE—
039Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportation for corporate and individual customers; travel information services, namely, providing information about transportationACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in travel agency management, reservations for transportation and hotel accommodations, meeting planning and quality control; computer software design for others in the field of travelACTIVE—
043Travel agency services for corporate and individual customers, namely, making reservations and bookings for hotel accommodations.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 3, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 2, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 26, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 26, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 27, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 27, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 11, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 21, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 18, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance