USPTO serial 76395785
TCCT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TCCT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Jose, CA
Milpitas, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric J. Curtin
Walter D. Fields Fields IP, PS900 West SteubenPO Box 327Bingen, WA 98605Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, namely, semiconductor wafer processing equipment and components, namely, for making any of the following goods-- computer hardware components, namely semiconductor chips, integrated circuits and semiconductor memory circuits | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Computer hardware components, namely semiconductor chips, integrated circuits and semiconductor memory circuits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |