USPTO serial 76395823
DIGZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2813768Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 10, 2004
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIGZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin G. Raskin
Amy F. Divino Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen LLP250 Park Ave.New York, NY 10177UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, NAMELY, GENERAL CONTRACTING AND SITE WORK FOR COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS; EXCAVATION; RETAINING WALL INSTALLATION AND REPAIR; WATER MAIN INSTALLATION AND REPAIR; PIPE INSTALLATION AND REPAIR; TRENCHING; DRAIN INSTALLATION AND REPAIR; SEPTIC INSTALLATION AND REPAIR; SEWER AND SEPTIC ABANDONMENT; [BUILDING, DEMOLITION] * BUILDING DEMOLITION * | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 26, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |