USPTO serial 76396044
QUICK SHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUICK SHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ansel M. Schwartz
ANSEL M SCHWARTZONE STERLING PLZ201 N CRAIG ST STE 304PITTSBURGH, PA 15213Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | electric lighting fixtures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 17, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |