Drawing for VOICE DIRECTORY

USPTO serial 76396066

VOICE DIRECTORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VOICE DIRECTORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STUART J. SINDER, ESQ.

STUART J SINDER ESQ KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing speech-enabled searching capabilities for others in databases and information directories, namely, data automation through proprietary software in the nature of evaluating, sorting, reconfiguring and manipulating data in databases and directories of individuals and businesses to facilitate speech recognition and speech synthesis; technical support for directory assistance providers, namely, data automation through proprietary softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 17, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 17, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 24, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 14, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 14, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 7, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 16, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance